<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/</link> <description>it&#039;s all about applications and virtualization</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Frankie</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-60</link> <dc:creator>Frankie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:42:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-60</guid> <description>IE8 with TS/Citrix Server is much better than IE6 and IE7. At the moment I&#039;m testing IE8 as streaming application. There are a lot of interessting news about IE8 as streaming application. I will have a look at the memory. Keep up the good work.Regards,
Frank</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE8 with TS/Citrix Server is much better than IE6 and IE7. At the moment I&#8217;m testing IE8 as streaming application. There are a lot of interessting news about IE8 as streaming application. I will have a look at the memory. Keep up the good work.</p><p>Regards,<br
/> Frank</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Detlef</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-59</link> <dc:creator>Detlef</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-59</guid> <description>so iss das mit den Updates...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so iss das mit den Updates&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Use iPhone as a Mouse on iPad with Citrix Receiver</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-58</link> <dc:creator>Use iPhone as a Mouse on iPad with Citrix Receiver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:57:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-58</guid> <description>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...] </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Remote Desktop Services &#38; XenApp 6 Tuning Tips ADMX Group Policy</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-57</link> <dc:creator>Remote Desktop Services &#38; XenApp 6 Tuning Tips ADMX Group Policy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:07:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-57</guid> <description>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...] </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Citrix Provisioning Services 5.6 - What's New</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-56</link> <dc:creator>Citrix Provisioning Services 5.6 - What's New</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-56</guid> <description>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...] </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet Explorer 8 on Terminal Server [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-55</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-55</guid> <description>Hi Mark,Yes I&#039;m aware of that setting, that will be in the next post of &quot;Why Internet Explorer will kill your memory – Part II&quot; coming soon.Eric</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p><p>Yes I&#8217;m aware of that setting, that will be in the next post of &#8220;Why Internet Explorer will kill your memory – Part II&#8221; coming soon.</p><p>Eric</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mark</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-54</link> <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-54</guid> <description>I think you guys need to set the Tab Process Growth to 0.  You can do this via GPO or registry, but it should stop IE from running away with memory by creating more than one iexplore.exe process.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys need to set the Tab Process Growth to 0.  You can do this via GPO or registry, but it should stop IE from running away with memory by creating more than one iexplore.exe process.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kirk M. Schafer</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-53</link> <dc:creator>Kirk M. Schafer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-53</guid> <description>Note to posters: I think the article is asking how IE8 is on Terminal Services; if you&#039;re not using that, a general comment on stability may not be as helpful.In my case I have experience with an nComputing platform (essentially TS) and find that performance in IE is ridiculously inefficient. Flicker, lag, and memory use are all undesirably noted--so much so that users (on a dual-core machine normally running at 2% CPU) tend to keep clicking IE&#039;s icon because they think it&#039;s not starting. There is a registry setting that fixes flicker (Force Offscreen Composition) but this is inconsistently applied, and memory use--just by IE--is nearly 50% of the total consumed. While there are a number of documents to tweak IE (e.g., on this site, such as &quot;Why Internet Explorer Will Kill Your Memory&quot;), I will probably be forced to install Firefox and silently replace the IE link to start that instead.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to posters: I think the article is asking how IE8 is on Terminal Services; if you&#8217;re not using that, a general comment on stability may not be as helpful.</p><p>In my case I have experience with an nComputing platform (essentially TS) and find that performance in IE is ridiculously inefficient. Flicker, lag, and memory use are all undesirably noted&#8211;so much so that users (on a dual-core machine normally running at 2% CPU) tend to keep clicking IE&#8217;s icon because they think it&#8217;s not starting. There is a registry setting that fixes flicker (Force Offscreen Composition) but this is inconsistently applied, and memory use&#8211;just by IE&#8211;is nearly 50% of the total consumed. While there are a number of documents to tweak IE (e.g., on this site, such as &#8220;Why Internet Explorer Will Kill Your Memory&#8221;), I will probably be forced to install Firefox and silently replace the IE link to start that instead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mikael Petersson</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-52</link> <dc:creator>Mikael Petersson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:02:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-52</guid> <description>Using IE8 in a Terminal Server solution like fex Citrix is a no go for me. I have experienced the same result testing it in a test environment and have for the moment gone for Firefox until I can find a solution on the memory usage IE8 needs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using IE8 in a Terminal Server solution like fex Citrix is a no go for me. I have experienced the same result testing it in a test environment and have for the moment gone for Firefox until I can find a solution on the memory usage IE8 needs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2009/internet-explorer-8-on-terminal-server/#comment-51</link> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:05:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=201#comment-51</guid> <description>i am pretty much satisfied about the features and stability of Internet Explorer 8. it is much better than IE6 or IE7.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am pretty much satisfied about the features and stability of Internet Explorer 8. it is much better than IE6 or IE7.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 60/67 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.xenappblog.com

Served from: www.xenappblog.com @ 2012-02-04 13:29:52 -->
