<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Using Group Policy to hide and map specified drives</title> <atom:link href="http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/</link> <description>it&#039;s all about applications and virtualization</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Seb</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-703</link> <dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:49:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-703</guid> <description>Solved! The Windows 2003 Server was missing Client Side Extensions for Windows Server 2003 (KB943729).Thank you for your time Eirik.Sebastiano</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solved! The Windows 2003 Server was missing Client Side Extensions for Windows Server 2003 (KB943729).</p><p>Thank you for your time Eirik.</p><p>Sebastiano</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-699</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:31:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-699</guid> <description>Strange, please check the event log on the Terminal Servers in question. You could also try the same policy on a Windows 7 machine just to make sure. The User Security Context is required.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, please check the event log on the Terminal Servers in question. You could also try the same policy on a Windows 7 machine just to make sure. The User Security Context is required.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seb</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-698</link> <dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-698</guid> <description>Hi Eirik, the GPO is linked to the OU and GP loopback is enabled. actually from GPRESULT I see the policy applied, but no drives mapped. The GPO config is the same as your post, I also tried to put Create instead of Replace... but same result.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eirik, the GPO is linked to the OU and GP loopback is enabled. actually from GPRESULT I see the policy applied, but no drives mapped. The GPO config is the same as your post, I also tried to put Create instead of Replace&#8230; but same result.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-697</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-697</guid> <description>Hi Seb, try linking the GPO to the Terminal Server OU and make sure you&#039;re using Group Policy Loopback Processing Mode - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Seb, try linking the GPO to the Terminal Server OU and make sure you&#8217;re using Group Policy Loopback Processing Mode &#8211; <a
href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231287</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seb</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-696</link> <dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:40:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-696</guid> <description>Hi Eirik,thank you for your post.I created the GPO to map a drive from a Win 2008 TS and for a Win 2003 TS.The policy is applied to the Win 2003 server but the drive never appears on user sessions.I looked at the event viewer but found nothing.Have you have had such issue?Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eirik,</p><p>thank you for your post.</p><p>I created the GPO to map a drive from a Win 2008 TS and for a Win 2003 TS.</p><p>The policy is applied to the Win 2003 server but the drive never appears on user sessions.</p><p>I looked at the event viewer but found nothing.</p><p>Have you have had such issue?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-678</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:16:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-678</guid> <description>Thanks for your comment Erik, I haven&#039;t read this before but it seems like this is fixed with W2K8 Service Pack 1. In terms of performance we always see faster login with GPP instead of loginscripts. The script you&#039;re using is one way to fix this, but I personally mean that everybody with more than 4 servers should run Citrix Provisioning Services. So in a PVS environment this won&#039;t happen since the disk is write protected.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Erik, I haven&#8217;t read this before but it seems like this is fixed with W2K8 Service Pack 1. In terms of performance we always see faster login with GPP instead of loginscripts. The script you&#8217;re using is one way to fix this, but I personally mean that everybody with more than 4 servers should run Citrix Provisioning Services. So in a PVS environment this won&#8217;t happen since the disk is write protected.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erik Lundgren</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-677</link> <dc:creator>Erik Lundgren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:48:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-677</guid> <description>I have seen that you in several articles praise the Group Policy Preferences (GPP).
I agree from an administrators point of view. It&#039;s very easy to administrate.
But what about performance in a terminal server environment? Have you read this articel?
http://bit.ly/adfViiWe have made a script that cleans “c:\programdata\microsoft\group policy\history\” on reboot, but it feels like GPP is not realy intended to be used in terminal server environments.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen that you in several articles praise the Group Policy Preferences (GPP).<br
/> I agree from an administrators point of view. It&#8217;s very easy to administrate.<br
/> But what about performance in a terminal server environment? Have you read this articel?<br
/> <a
href="http://bit.ly/adfVii" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/adfVii</a></p><p>We have made a script that cleans “c:\programdata\microsoft\group policy\history\” on reboot, but it feels like GPP is not realy intended to be used in terminal server environments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Group Policy Management &#8211; Import registry files</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-623</link> <dc:creator>Group Policy Management &#8211; Import registry files</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-623</guid> <description>[...] are accessed via the Group Policy Management console.In Preferences you can configure things like Hide and Map specified drives, Folder Redirection, Folder deletion/creation etc. and of course Registry Settings. On this blog [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are accessed via the Group Policy Management console.In Preferences you can configure things like Hide and Map specified drives, Folder Redirection, Folder deletion/creation etc. and of course Registry Settings. On this blog [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cristiano Santos</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-369</link> <dc:creator>Cristiano Santos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-369</guid> <description>Thnaks for the nice post Trond!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thnaks for the nice post Trond!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/using-group-policy-hide-map-specified-drives/#comment-368</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1509#comment-368</guid> <description>Thanks Alexey, I do agree. Normally the home drive is common and the rest is based upon Item Target Leveling for the GPO Mapped Drives</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alexey, I do agree. Normally the home drive is common and the rest is based upon Item Target Leveling for the GPO Mapped Drives</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 60/67 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.xenappblog.com

Served from: www.xenappblog.com @ 2012-02-04 13:40:18 -->
