<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: XenApp 6 Tuning Group Policy for Windows 2008 R2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/</link> <description>it&#039;s all about applications and virtualization</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-1319</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:25:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-1319</guid> <description>Hi Ken. The GPO for XA6 also applies to XA65 and are ready to go.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken. The GPO for XA6 also applies to XA65 and are ready to go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-1318</link> <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:19:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-1318</guid> <description>I&#039;m setting up a new XenApp 6.5 farm and using all server 2008 R2 64 bit policies. Will I be able to use this GPO out of the box?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m setting up a new XenApp 6.5 farm and using all server 2008 R2 64 bit policies. Will I be able to use this GPO out of the box?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-773</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:14:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-773</guid> <description>No Mike, it&#039;s the same. This happened when I moved the blog to a faster hosting company and I needed to re-enter all the downloads.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Mike, it&#8217;s the same. This happened when I moved the blog to a faster hosting company and I needed to re-enter all the downloads.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-772</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-772</guid> <description>Just noticed a new updated &quot;date&quot; for this Sep 2011. Version is the same. Doest it mean there were updates to it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed a new updated &#8220;date&#8221; for this Sep 2011. Version is the same. Doest it mean there were updates to it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-760</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:24:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-760</guid> <description>Thanks Haakon, that&#039;s correct. This GPO template is provided as a starting point. Every environment are different, so some customization is always required. The blog article from Daniele are great for verifying the SMB stuff.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Haakon, that&#8217;s correct. This GPO template is provided as a starting point. Every environment are different, so some customization is always required. The blog article from Daniele are great for verifying the SMB stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Haakon</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-759</link> <dc:creator>Haakon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:54:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-759</guid> <description>The registry settings from KB324446 are valid on a XenApp 6.x server if you are using a Windows Server 2003 as file server. This is because you will be using SMB 1.0.
If the file server is Windows Server 2008/2008R2, then the registry settings has no value.
2008R2 is using SMB 2.0 and doesn&#039;t use the registry values from KB324446.Read this great blog article: http://www.danieletosatto.com/2010/10/22/smb-tuning-for-xenapp-and-file-servers-on-windows-server-2008/Haakon</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The registry settings from KB324446 are valid on a XenApp 6.x server if you are using a Windows Server 2003 as file server. This is because you will be using SMB 1.0.<br
/> If the file server is Windows Server 2008/2008R2, then the registry settings has no value.<br
/> 2008R2 is using SMB 2.0 and doesn&#8217;t use the registry values from KB324446.</p><p>Read this great blog article: <a
href="http://www.danieletosatto.com/2010/10/22/smb-tuning-for-xenapp-and-file-servers-on-windows-server-2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.danieletosatto.com/2010/10/22/smb-tuning-for-xenapp-and-file-servers-on-windows-server-2008/</a></p><p>Haakon</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-361</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:11:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-361</guid> <description>Hi Michael,The policy have not been updated since its release in July, so the content on Pierre&#039;s site is more up to date (December 2010).
The best thing would be to sort the registry keys and check them one by one. Still my policy would save you a lot of time.Please let me know if you find any new or modified registry keys that I should add to the policy. Currently I have no time to do this since I&#039;m working hard on releasing my Citrix XenApp 6 Video Training Course.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p><p>The policy have not been updated since its release in July, so the content on Pierre&#8217;s site is more up to date (December 2010).<br
/> The best thing would be to sort the registry keys and check them one by one. Still my policy would save you a lot of time.</p><p>Please let me know if you find any new or modified registry keys that I should add to the policy. Currently I have no time to do this since I&#8217;m working hard on releasing my Citrix XenApp 6 Video Training Course.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-360</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-360</guid> <description>Hi, just curious as to how the importable settings you&#039;ve facilitated compare to the following updated article based on the post you listed as a reference:http://www.citrixtools.net/en/Articles/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5610/Windows-2008-R2-Remote-Desktop-and-XenApp-6-Tuning-Tips-Update.aspx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just curious as to how the importable settings you&#8217;ve facilitated compare to the following updated article based on the post you listed as a reference:</p><p><a
href="http://www.citrixtools.net/en/Articles/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5610/Windows-2008-R2-Remote-Desktop-and-XenApp-6-Tuning-Tips-Update.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.citrixtools.net/en/Articles/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5610/Windows-2008-R2-Remote-Desktop-and-XenApp-6-Tuning-Tips-Update.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trond Eirik Haavarstein</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-359</link> <dc:creator>Trond Eirik Haavarstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-359</guid> <description>Thanks Fredrik for this in-depth feedback.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Fredrik for this in-depth feedback.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fredrik</title><link>http://www.xenappblog.com/2010/xenapp-6-tuning-group-policy-for-windows-2008-r2/#comment-358</link> <dc:creator>Fredrik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xenappblog.com/?p=1472#comment-358</guid> <description>@Mark B,
Nice to see someone doing their homework.
As you&#039;ve found - TCP keepalives are hardcoded.
IOPageLockLimit does jack shit.Lanmanserver settings are good in WS 2000/2003 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              2000/2003      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, solves freezes in TS (logon/off) MS KB 324446. But I bet that it is unnecessary in 2008, will look into deeper some time.LargeSystemCache won&#039;t give you unstable systems, this is the key for the Memory usage setting in System Options/Performance; enabled prioritizes System cache, disabled prioritizes Programs. In a multi user environment you&#039;d rather set this to System cache as in the adm...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark B,<br
/> Nice to see someone doing their homework.<br
/> As you&#8217;ve found &#8211; TCP keepalives are hardcoded.<br
/> IOPageLockLimit does jack shit.</p><p>Lanmanserver settings are good in WS 2000/2003 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              2000/2003      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, solves freezes in TS (logon/off) MS KB 324446. But I bet that it is unnecessary in 2008, will look into deeper some time.</p><p>LargeSystemCache won&#8217;t give you unstable systems, this is the key for the Memory usage setting in System Options/Performance; enabled prioritizes System cache, disabled prioritizes Programs. In a multi user environment you&#8217;d rather set this to System cache as in the adm&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 60/67 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.xenappblog.com

Served from: www.xenappblog.com @ 2012-02-04 13:46:03 -->
